Monthly Archives: March 2020

California: Settlement Agreements with Staffing Agencies Don’t Necessarily Cover Staffing Clients

2020-03-01T09:18:01-08:00March 1st, 2020|

Applies to:           All Employers with CA Employees Effective:             February 6, 2020   In Grande v. Eisenhower Medical Ctr., the California Court of Appeal stated that an employee's settlement of a wage and hour claim with a staffing agency does not prevent the employee from later suing the staffing agency's client on the same wage and

California: Clarification on Defining Exempt Managerial Duties

2020-03-01T09:16:59-08:00March 1st, 2020|

Applies to:           All Employers with CA Employees Effective:             December 18, 2019   In The Safeway Wage and Hour Cases, the California Court of Appeal revisited how to determine whether a manager’s duties qualify as exempt or nonexempt. Generally, the court identified two types of work that each qualify as exempt from overtime.   A manager

EEOC Ends EEO-1 Pay Data Collection Component; 2019 Filing Timeline Still Up in the Air

2020-03-01T09:16:03-08:00March 1st, 2020|

Applies to:           All Employers Effective:             February 10, 2020   For the last two years, employers subject to EEO-1 reporting had to notate compensation information and submit pay data alongside demographic data.  This February, a D.C. district court recently approved the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) request to consider its 2017 and 2018 pay data collection

NLRB Issues Final Rule on Joint Employer Standard, Eliminates Browning-Ferris Test

2020-03-01T09:15:02-08:00March 1st, 2020|

Applies to:           All Employers Effective:             April 27, 2020   The Browning-Ferris saga appears to be coming to a close. In 2015, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a ruling saying that joint employer status can be determined based on control, direct or indirect, of the worker’s terms and conditions of employment. After some back

Go to Top